Re: [patch] cipso: remove an unneeded NULL check in cipso_v4_doi_add()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 05:20:11PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > -       if (doi_def == NULL || doi_def->doi == CIPSO_V4_DOI_UNKNOWN)
> > +       if (doi_def->doi == CIPSO_V4_DOI_UNKNOWN)
> >                goto doi_add_return;
> >        for (iter = 0; iter < CIPSO_V4_TAG_MAXCNT; iter++) {
> >                switch (doi_def->tags[iter]) {
> 
> I'd prefer to keep the NULL check in there as it does afford a little
> bit of extra safety and this is management code after all, not
> per-packet processing code, so the extra check should have no
> observable performance impact.

The dereferences on the lines before mean we would Oops before
reaching the check.  But I guess I can move the check forward.  The
error handling at goto doi_add_return relies on a non-NULL value for
doi_def but I could just put a return in front of the dereference.

	if (!doi_def)
		return -EINVAL;

I'll send a patch to do this tomorrow.

regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux