Re: [patch -next] bcma: signedness bug in bcma_get_next_core()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:01:11PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Dan, I asked you to use int in both: call and function declaration.
> I'm the author of that code, and I don't have anything against
> modifying that :)
> 
> I think int is used much more often that s32 for errors.
> 

No problem.  Should I make bcma_erom_get_mst_port() return 0 on
success while I'm at it?

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux