On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:03:57 -0600 Noah Watkins wrote: > Pardon the newbie question here, this email is in reference to two > additional emails that I just sent to janitors list: > > [PATCH 1/2] zram: make global var "devices" use unique name > [PATCH 2/2] zram: make global var "num_devices" use unique name > > Originally I had submitted these patches to Nitin Gupta (zram guy), > Greg KH, and linux-next > > I didn't receive a response, but then realized I didn't actually know > what to expect. I checked out all the relevant docs on submitting Some maintainers reply when they merge a patch and some don't. GregKH usually does, but with a time lag of up to roughly 1 week. > patches, but it all seems a bit nebulous still. Does this submission > look OK? Do those variable names currently cause a problem? They are not static, but they also are not exported symbols [EXPORT_SYMBOL()]. Do these patches fix any reported warnings? If so, you should include those warning messages and what tool reported them. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
