From: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:08:46 +0200 (CEST) > On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Joe Perches wrote: > >> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 19:10 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: >> > The failed_get label is used after the call to clk_get has succeeded, so it >> > should be moved up above the call to clk_put. >> [] >> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c >> [] >> > @@ -978,8 +978,8 @@ static int __devinit flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> > failed_map: >> > release_mem_region(mem->start, mem_size); >> > failed_req: >> > - clk_put(clk); >> > failed_get: >> > + clk_put(clk); >> > failed_clock: >> > return err; >> >> If this is correct, it might be better to rename all the >> uses of failed_req to failed_get and delete label failed_req. > > As I replied to Walter Harms, I believe it is correct, because I don't see > anything in the called functions that needs to be freed. I can redo the > patch to eliminate the label. Please do. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
