On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 21:09 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote: > > clk_get() is defined per-architecture, sometimes it is NULL only. > > In this case there is a definition in the same file, so it doesn't seem > necessary to worry about possible other ones. Unless there is some goal > in the future to remove the local one? My oppinion is that even such architecture dependent code written in architecure indepenent way is highly desirable. Besides more clean code it is probably review by smaller group of people, so it is potentially more buggy. Thanks, -- Vasiliy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
