On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 22:21 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > This code isn't the same. > > You deleted that return and now you do the driver ECC check. > > Is that correct? > You are right Joe, sorry for that. Should I remove the dead code after > the return SUCCESS or keep it? As I said before, I think you should delete it. On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 12:26 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > You might as well take out useless code after returns > instead of just changing function names. > If you keep it you should reformat it. Doesn't matter much though. cheers, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
