On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:09:11AM -0700, matt mooney wrote: > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 12:16:35AM -0700, matt mooney wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:35 PM, T Dent <tdent48227@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > I patch against the next-20101006 tree. > >> > > >> > The patch series replace use of <module>-objs with <module>-y in the > >> > staging directory. > >> > >> Commit messages are written in the present tense. You happen to be > >> using two different tenses within the commit message, which is truly > >> odd. And why did you not split apart those atrocious statements with > >> the infinite column width? > > > > As Dan said, we understand what is happening here, and we do not have > > grammer police for changelog comments, thank goodness. > > > >> This patch series adds little benefit. As Sam has suggested, a more > >> general cleanup would be a better goal, and staging is an area that > >> needs extra attention some of which has already been pointed out in > >> other emails. > > > > But these patches are all good to have, so I will be applying them, > > please don't think they are unwanted at all. > > > > This is good to know. I wonder how well received these changes will be > in other parts of the kernel though. It depends on the subsystem maintainer. good luck, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
