Re: [patch 2/2] input/tps6507x-ts: zero vs NULL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 02:02:15PM +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This patch silences a sparse warning:
> 
> drivers/input/touchscreen/tps6507x-ts.c:345:19:
> 	warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
> drivers/input/touchscreen/tps6507x-ts.c:367:19:
> 	warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/tps6507x-ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/tps6507x-ts.c
> index b99db09..1e57e4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/tps6507x-ts.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/tps6507x-ts.c
> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ err2:
>  	cancel_delayed_work(&tsc->work);
>  	flush_workqueue(tsc->wq);
>  	destroy_workqueue(tsc->wq);
> -	tsc->wq = 0;
> +	tsc->wq = NULL;
>  	input_free_device(input_dev);
>  err1:
>  	kfree(tsc);
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static int __devexit tps6507x_ts_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	cancel_delayed_work(&tsc->work);
>  	flush_workqueue(tsc->wq);

Why isn't it cancel_delayed_work_sync()?

>  	destroy_workqueue(tsc->wq);
> -	tsc->wq = 0;
> +	tsc->wq = NULL;
>  

Setting tsc to 0/NULL does not make much sense as it is being freed a
couple of lines below.

>  	input_free_device(input_dev);
>  

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux