Jack Stone wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> * Jack Stone <jwjstone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> >>> >>>> No, i mean, this approach should be changed, and i dont think any >>>> type cast change should go via any trivial tree. It's easy to mess >>>> it up. Please submit them to the maintainer trees >>>> >>>> >>> Ok. I'll try and find appropriate CCs. I'm going out shortly so it >>> might take me a while. >>> >>> >> Since you do many such patches it might make sense to script up a >> "who maintains what" kind of script - and share that script with >> lkml. >> >> I have this silly little script: >> >> git log $@ | grep Signed-off-by: | >> cut -d: -f2 | cut -d\< -f1 | >> sort | uniq -c | sort -n >> >> To find out any recent parties that touches a particular file. But >> it would be nice to somehow automate the pickup of mailing-list >> addresses from MAINTAINERS for example. We've literally got hundreds >> of email lists there. >> >> It is not trivial to do though :-) >> >> > It would be useful. The main problem is working out what files belong to > what MAINTAINERS entries. > > I'll see what I can cook up. > > Thanks, > > Jack > Look what turned up! http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123916809504492&w=2 Thanks, Jack -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
