Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Jack Stone <jwjstone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >>> No, i mean, this approach should be changed, and i dont think any >>> type cast change should go via any trivial tree. It's easy to mess >>> it up. Please submit them to the maintainer trees >>> >> Ok. I'll try and find appropriate CCs. I'm going out shortly so it >> might take me a while. >> > > Since you do many such patches it might make sense to script up a > "who maintains what" kind of script - and share that script with > lkml. > > I have this silly little script: > > git log $@ | grep Signed-off-by: | > cut -d: -f2 | cut -d\< -f1 | > sort | uniq -c | sort -n > > To find out any recent parties that touches a particular file. But > it would be nice to somehow automate the pickup of mailing-list > addresses from MAINTAINERS for example. We've literally got hundreds > of email lists there. > > It is not trivial to do though :-) > It would be useful. The main problem is working out what files belong to what MAINTAINERS entries. I'll see what I can cook up. Thanks, Jack -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
