Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/sfc: fix sparse warnings: Should it be static?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Hannes Eder <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:54:38 +0100

> Impact: Include the header file.  If CONFIG_SFC_MTD is not defined
> then the functions 'efx_mtd_remove' and 'efx_mtd_rename' are defined
> 'static inline' with an empty function body in the header file, but
> the the whole file mtd.c is not built in this case.
> 
> Fix this sparse warnings:
>   drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:204:6: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_remove' was not declared. Should it be static?
>   drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:221:6: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_rename' was not declared. Should it be static?
>   drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:230:5: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_probe' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Eder <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied to net-next-2.6, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux