On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Ben Hutchings
<bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hannes Eder wrote:
>> Impact: Include header file and include the function under the same
>> condition as in the header file. If CONFIG_SFS_MTD is not defined
>> than the functions 'efx_mtd_remove' and 'efx_mtd_rename' are defined
>> 'static inline' with an empty function body in the header file.
>>
>> Fix this sparse warnings:
>> drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:204:6: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_remove' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:221:6: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_rename' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:230:5: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_probe' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Eder <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c | 3 +++
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c b/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c
>> index 665cafb..94c9ed8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>> #define EFX_DRIVER_NAME "sfc_mtd"
>> #include "net_driver.h"
>> #include "spi.h"
>> +#include "efx.h"
>>
>> #define EFX_SPI_VERIFY_BUF_LEN 16
>>
>
> OK, but...
>
>> @@ -201,6 +202,7 @@ static void efx_mtd_sync(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SFC_MTD
>> void efx_mtd_remove(struct efx_nic *efx)
>> {
>> if (efx->spi_flash && efx->spi_flash->mtd) {
>> @@ -266,3 +268,4 @@ int efx_mtd_probe(struct efx_nic *efx)
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SFC_MTD */
>
> This is wrong. The entire file is conditional on CONFIG_SFC_MTD.
Even better than. It's actually not wrong, just done twice, so we can
omit it, thank you Ben. I'll send an update.
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
