On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 13:59 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Tobias Klauser wrote:
>
> > The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
> >
> > The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
> > of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
> > feature.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c b/kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c
> > index eaca5ad..1883221 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c
> > @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static void backtrace_address(void *data, unsigned long addr, int reliable)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -const static struct stacktrace_ops backtrace_ops = {
> > +static const struct stacktrace_ops backtrace_ops = {
> > .warning = backtrace_warning,
> > .warning_symbol = backtrace_warning_symbol,
> > .stack = backtrace_stack,
>
> Steven, are you going to take this through wusb tree, or should I take it
> through trivial tree together with the rest of these patches? I don't seem
> to see this present in current -next.
Jiri, Ingo has it in his tip tree. I would expect that he'll be pushing
it out soon.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
