On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
>
> The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
> of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
> feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c b/kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c
> index eaca5ad..1883221 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static void backtrace_address(void *data, unsigned long addr, int reliable)
> }
> }
>
> -const static struct stacktrace_ops backtrace_ops = {
> +static const struct stacktrace_ops backtrace_ops = {
> .warning = backtrace_warning,
> .warning_symbol = backtrace_warning_symbol,
> .stack = backtrace_stack,
Steven, are you going to take this through wusb tree, or should I take it
through trivial tree together with the rest of these patches? I don't seem
to see this present in current -next.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
