Re: [PATCH] drivers/char/bsr.c: Storage class should be before const qualifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Tobias Klauser wrote:

> The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
> 
> The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the
> beginning of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an
> obsolescent feature.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/char/bsr.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/bsr.c b/drivers/char/bsr.c
> index f6094ae..140ea10 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/bsr.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/bsr.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int bsr_open(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -const static struct file_operations bsr_fops = {
> +static const struct file_operations bsr_fops = {
>  	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>  	.mmap  = bsr_mmap,
>  	.open  = bsr_open,

This doesn't seem to be picked by anyone for current -next/-mmotm, I have
applied it to trivial tree. Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux