On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
>
> The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
> of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
> feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/h8300/kernel/timer/tpu.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/h8300/kernel/timer/tpu.c b/arch/h8300/kernel/timer/tpu.c
> index df7f453..79ae1db 100644
> --- a/arch/h8300/kernel/timer/tpu.c
> +++ b/arch/h8300/kernel/timer/tpu.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static struct irqaction tpu_irq = {
> .mask = CPU_MASK_NONE,
> };
>
> -const static int __initdata divide_rate[] = {
> +static const int __initdata divide_rate[] = {
> #if CONFIG_H8300_TPU_CH == 0
> 1,4,16,64,0,0,0,0,
> #elif (CONFIG_H8300_TPU_CH == 1) || (CONFIG_H8300_TPU_CH == 5)
This doesn't seem to be picked by anyone for current -next/-mmotm, I have
applied it to trivial tree. Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
