Re: [PATCH 2/3] drivers/gpu/drm: fix sparse warnings: unexport symbols

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Jaswinder Singh Rajput
<jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 16:28 +0100, Hannes Eder wrote:
>> Fix this sparse warnings:
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c:137:6: warning: symbol 'drm_helper_probe_connector_modes' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c:360:6: warning: symbol 'drm_mode_validate_clocks' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Eder <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c |    6 +++---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c       |    7 +++----
>>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
>> index d8a982b..a0b2601 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
>> @@ -134,8 +134,9 @@ void drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes);
>>
>> -void drm_helper_probe_connector_modes(struct drm_device *dev, uint32_t maxX,
>> -                                   uint32_t maxY)
>> +static void drm_helper_probe_connector_modes(struct drm_device *dev,
>> +                                          uint32_t maxX,
>> +                                          uint32_t maxY)
>>  {
>>       struct drm_connector *connector;
>>
>> @@ -143,7 +144,6 @@ void drm_helper_probe_connector_modes(struct drm_device *dev, uint32_t maxX,
>>               drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes(connector, maxX, maxY);
>>       }
>>  }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_helper_probe_connector_modes);
>>
>
> hmm, what you are trying to do ?
>
>>
>>  /**
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> index 7c36f16..c0cfe39 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> @@ -357,9 +357,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_validate_size);
>>   * sure each mode falls within a given range (defined by @min and @max
>>   * arrays) and sets @mode->status as needed.
>>   */
>> -void drm_mode_validate_clocks(struct drm_device *dev,
>> -                           struct list_head *mode_list,
>> -                           int *min, int *max, int n_ranges)
>> +static void drm_mode_validate_clocks(struct drm_device *dev,
>> +                                  struct list_head *mode_list,
>> +                                  int *min, int *max, int n_ranges)
>>  {
>>       struct drm_display_mode *mode;
>>       int i;
>> @@ -376,7 +376,6 @@ void drm_mode_validate_clocks(struct drm_device *dev,
>>                       mode->status = MODE_CLOCK_RANGE;
>>       }
>>  }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_validate_clocks);
>
> ??

In both cases: a grep over the entire kernel tree shows that the
function is only used within the compilation unit it is defined,
therefore make it static and un-EXPORT it.

Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux