Since neither the list_splice() nor __list_splice() routines modify
their first argument, might as well declare them "const".
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
compile-tested on x86 with "make defconfig".
diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h
index 75ce2cb..57ad73e 100644
--- a/include/linux/list.h
+++ b/include/linux/list.h
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static inline int list_empty_careful(const struct list_head *head)
return (next == head) && (next == head->prev);
}
-static inline void __list_splice(struct list_head *list,
+static inline void __list_splice(const struct list_head *list,
struct list_head *head)
{
struct list_head *first = list->next;
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static inline void __list_splice(struct list_head *list,
* @list: the new list to add.
* @head: the place to add it in the first list.
*/
-static inline void list_splice(struct list_head *list, struct list_head *head)
+static inline void list_splice(const struct list_head *list, struct list_head *head)
{
if (!list_empty(list))
__list_splice(list, head);
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
