On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Julia Lawall wrote:
> The question still stands, though. list_head has both next and prev
> fields. Is it desirable to convert a singly linked list to a doubly
> linked list just for the benefit of using the functions in list.h,
> at a cost of more memory?
i'm guessing no. given how many potential places there are for
converting *doubly* linked lists, i would leave singly linked lists
alone.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
