On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:02:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 14:56, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 09:50:04AM -0500, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote: > >> Nícolas F. R. A. Prado (4): > >> firmware: coreboot: Generate modalias uevent for devices > >> firmware: coreboot: Generate aliases for coreboot modules > >> firmware: coreboot: Replace tag with id table in driver struct > >> arm64: defconfig: Enable support for cbmem entries in the coreboot table > > > > is it ok for Tzung-Bi to merge this last patch for the defconfig through the > > chrome-platform-firmware tree? > > I would much prefer to see this patch get sent to soc@xxxxxxxxxx > so I can pick it up through the soc tree. I'm usually not worried > about bisection issues with defconfig changes since most users > have their own .config anyway, and in this case I don't see > any strict dependency and would just merge the patch directly. Sounds good, I'll send it separately there. And you're right, the patch doesn't have any dependency. Thanks, Nícolas
