On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 14:56, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 09:50:04AM -0500, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
>> Nícolas F. R. A. Prado (4):
>> firmware: coreboot: Generate modalias uevent for devices
>> firmware: coreboot: Generate aliases for coreboot modules
>> firmware: coreboot: Replace tag with id table in driver struct
>> arm64: defconfig: Enable support for cbmem entries in the coreboot table
>
> is it ok for Tzung-Bi to merge this last patch for the defconfig through the
> chrome-platform-firmware tree?
I would much prefer to see this patch get sent to soc@xxxxxxxxxx
so I can pick it up through the soc tree. I'm usually not worried
about bisection issues with defconfig changes since most users
have their own .config anyway, and in this case I don't see
any strict dependency and would just merge the patch directly.
Arnd
