On Thu, 2024-01-04 at 16:57 +0800, Huacai Chen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 7:06 PM Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2023-12-27 at 15:03 +0800, WANG Xuerui wrote: > > > And even though the kernel is built with relaxation disabled, so > > > far a small number of R_LARCH_RELAX marker relocs are still emitted as > > > part of la.* pseudo instructions in assembly. > > > > I'd consider it a toolchain bug... Is there a reproducer? > Any updates? Should I apply this patch for loongarch-next? Tiezhu told me this should be reproducible with GCC 14 and Binutils-2.42 development snapshots and defconfig. I'm trying... -- Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
