On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 5:58 PM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 7:06 PM Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2023-12-27 at 15:03 +0800, WANG Xuerui wrote: > > > And even though the kernel is built with relaxation disabled, so > > > far a small number of R_LARCH_RELAX marker relocs are still emitted as > > > part of la.* pseudo instructions in assembly. > > > > I'd consider it a toolchain bug... Is there a reproducer? > Any updates? Should I apply this patch for loongarch-next? This is odd. At least, Fixes: 3d36f4298ba9 is unrelated. The instruction to reproduce it was requested. I did not see any error for defconfig with loongarch64-linux-gcc 13.2 provided by 0day bot. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
