On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 6:28 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 6:14 AM Nick Desaulniers
> <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 8:28 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > find_elf_symbol() and find_elf_symbol2() are not good names.
> > >
> > > Rename them to find_tosym(), find_fromsym(), respectively.
> >
> > The comments maybe could be updated, too. The end of the comment looks
> > wrong for both.
>
>
> What do you mean?
>
> Please tell me which part should be changed, and how.
Attached the comment style changes. I didn't have precise wording in
mind for the comments; I was suggesting to see if the comments could
be updated to clarify what the functions are doing.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Thanks for the patch!
> > Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes in v5:
> > > - Change the names
> > >
> > > scripts/mod/modpost.c | 12 ++++++------
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.c b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> > > index 3b7b78e69137..0d2c2aff2c03 100644
> > > --- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> > > +++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> > > @@ -1124,8 +1124,8 @@ static inline int is_valid_name(struct elf_info *elf, Elf_Sym *sym)
> > > * In other cases the symbol needs to be looked up in the symbol table
> > > * based on section and address.
> > > * **/
> > > -static Elf_Sym *find_elf_symbol(struct elf_info *elf, Elf64_Sword addr,
> > > - Elf_Sym *relsym)
> > > +static Elf_Sym *find_tosym(struct elf_info *elf, Elf64_Sword addr,
> > > + Elf_Sym *relsym)
> > > {
> > > Elf_Sym *sym;
> > > Elf_Sym *near = NULL;
> > > @@ -1168,8 +1168,8 @@ static Elf_Sym *find_elf_symbol(struct elf_info *elf, Elf64_Sword addr,
> > > * The ELF format may have a better way to detect what type of symbol
> > > * it is, but this works for now.
> > > **/
> > > -static Elf_Sym *find_elf_symbol2(struct elf_info *elf, Elf_Addr addr,
> > > - unsigned int secndx)
> > > +static Elf_Sym *find_fromsym(struct elf_info *elf, Elf_Addr addr,
> > > + unsigned int secndx)
> > > {
> > > Elf_Sym *sym;
> > > Elf_Sym *near = NULL;
> > > @@ -1207,10 +1207,10 @@ static void default_mismatch_handler(const char *modname, struct elf_info *elf,
> > > const char *tosym;
> > > const char *fromsym;
> > >
> > > - from = find_elf_symbol2(elf, r->r_offset, fsecndx);
> > > + from = find_fromsym(elf, r->r_offset, fsecndx);
> > > fromsym = sym_name(elf, from);
> > >
> > > - to = find_elf_symbol(elf, r->r_addend, sym);
> > > + to = find_tosym(elf, r->r_addend, sym);
> > > tosym = sym_name(elf, to);
> > >
> > > /* check whitelist - we may ignore it */
> > > --
> > > 2.39.2
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > ~Nick Desaulniers
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.c b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
index d4531d09984d..1926e503b0d6 100644
--- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c
+++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
@@ -1131,13 +1131,13 @@ static inline int is_valid_name(struct elf_info *elf, Elf_Sym *sym)
return !is_mapping_symbol(name);
}
-/**
+/*
* Find symbol based on relocation record info.
* In some cases the symbol supplied is a valid symbol so
* return refsym. If st_name != 0 we assume this is a valid symbol.
* In other cases the symbol needs to be looked up in the symbol table
* based on section and address.
- * **/
+ */
static Elf_Sym *find_elf_symbol(struct elf_info *elf, Elf64_Sword addr,
Elf_Sym *relsym)
{
@@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ static Elf_Sym *find_elf_symbol(struct elf_info *elf, Elf64_Sword addr,
* If we find two symbols with equal offset prefer one with a valid name.
* The ELF format may have a better way to detect what type of symbol
* it is, but this works for now.
- **/
+ */
static Elf_Sym *find_elf_symbol2(struct elf_info *elf, Elf_Addr addr,
const char *sec)
{
