Hi Akira, On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 3:50 PM Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As I see v2 15/20, the SVG figure is among other documentation updates. > IIUC, this figure/logo was in PNG at first, but Jon suggested vector graphics. > If this is the case, it deserves an individual patch with a changelog > explaining why it is in SVG, where the Tux figure came from, what was the > original PNG logo, who contributed the SVG conversion, etc. Yeah, I can split the figure into another patch for the next round. Though one could argue the same for other files -- do you prefer to have more granular patches in general? > I understand you did all the SVG work, didn't you? > I don't think those many Co-developed-by tags apply to this figure. Yeah, I made the logo, but I reused the SVG forms of both the Rust and the Tux logos. The Tux SVG conversion (from Larry Ewing's one) was done by Garrett LeSage and IFo Hancroft, please see https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220207014418.GA28724@xxxxxxxxxx/ for details on that one. I will add these details to the split patch. > I'm saying this because this figure/logo can be reused in other open- > source projects on its own. It would be worth clarifying its origin > in the Git history as well as in COPYING-logo. I think the Tux SVG logo would be the most useful for other projects, which is why I submitted it to be added to the tree with the permission of Garrett and IFo (see link above). I am not sure if other open-source projects would need the Rust for Linux one, though, so it sounds like a good idea. I am happy to split the patch, clarify the origin and to add a `COPYING-logo` to the `Documentation/rust` folder too (pointing to the main one at `Documentation/` maybe). Cheers, Miguel
