Hi Miguel,
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 09:19:37 +0100,
Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi Akira,
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:47 AM Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/rust/logo.svg b/Documentation/rust/logo.svg
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..65be792a5abe
>>> --- /dev/null
>>
>> How about adding a suitable license identifier in a comment?
>
> For the next round, I did not apply this suggestion, because it is
> unclear which license identifier to use: it would be probably be the
> same as the `COPYING-logo` one (which would be used also for the Tux
> SVG, if it gets merged -- it was sent a while ago).
I see.
As I see v2 15/20, the SVG figure is among other documentation updates.
IIUC, this figure/logo was in PNG at first, but Jon suggested vector graphics.
If this is the case, it deserves an individual patch with a changelog
explaining why it is in SVG, where the Tux figure came from, what was the
original PNG logo, who contributed the SVG conversion, etc.
I understand you did all the SVG work, didn't you?
I don't think those many Co-developed-by tags apply to this figure.
I'm saying this because this figure/logo can be reused in other open-
source projects on its own. It would be worth clarifying its origin
in the Git history as well as in COPYING-logo.
Thanks, Akira
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
