On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 2:24 AM Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The source type is not needed for the macros [..]
Ahh. Yeah, as long as we don't do typedefs, it looks like we don't
need to pre-declare the member access types.
I expected that to be required, because function declarations taking
arguments need it, but that's because they create their own scope.
Just doing it in a regular struct (or in this case union) declaration
is fine.
So we would only need that post-declaration.
That said, your naming is wrong. It's not just about "self". It's any
case where the type we iterate over is declared after the type that
has the head.
So I suspect it would be a lot better to just always do it, and not do
that "self vs non-self" distinction.
Linus
