On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 06:18:18PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 11:16 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 9:09 AM Linus Torvalds > > <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:56 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > I've incorporated the feedback from Masahiro Yamada in this > > > > version, splitting out one more patch, rebasing on top of > > > > the kbuild tree, and changing the order of the patches. > > > > > > > > Please apply to the kbuild tree. > > > > > > I'd actually like to see this as a separate branch, so that I can > > > merge it early - or other peoples git branches end up depending on it. > > > > > > OK, I can apply this to a separate branch, kbuild-gnu11. > > (and I will queue this up shortly because it is already -rc7) > > > > Then, I will send two pull reqs in the next MW, > > but please note they will conflict with each other, > > between this gnu11 patch set and the following > > one in my usual kbuild branch: > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-kbuild/patch/20220201213542.2808035-1-quic_eberman@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > I hope this is not a complex conflict, but please let me know > > if you have any requests to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > All, applied to linux-kbuild/kbuild-gnu11. > > If somebody wants to give Reviewed-by, Acked-by, Tested-by, please. > > I will append them later. For the series: Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, Nathan
