On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 9:09 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:56 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > > > I've incorporated the feedback from Masahiro Yamada in this > > version, splitting out one more patch, rebasing on top of > > the kbuild tree, and changing the order of the patches. > > > > Please apply to the kbuild tree. > > I'd actually like to see this as a separate branch, so that I can > merge it early - or other peoples git branches end up depending on it. OK, I can apply this to a separate branch, kbuild-gnu11. (and I will queue this up shortly because it is already -rc7) Then, I will send two pull reqs in the next MW, but please note they will conflict with each other, between this gnu11 patch set and the following one in my usual kbuild branch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-kbuild/patch/20220201213542.2808035-1-quic_eberman@xxxxxxxxxxx/ I hope this is not a complex conflict, but please let me know if you have any requests to me. > Yeah, it shouldn't change anything on its own, but since it allows for > new syntax, we might have other things depending on it (I'm obviously > thinking of the list_for_each_entry() series that keeps getting > posted). > > Linus -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
