Re: [PATCH 11/19] vsprintf: add new `%pA` format specifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 8:14 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 04:56:32PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 4:46 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > That should be in a .h file somewhere.  Remember, don't put #ifdef in .c
> > > files please.

Why not put #ifdef in .c files?

> > Will do, thanks for reviewing!
> >
> > > Same here, this should not be needed if you put it in a .h file
> > > correctly.

I guess IS_ENABLED could be used in the .c code, but I don't see how
they could move the dispatch to rust_fmt_argument to a header without
moving the definition of pointer() to a header, which they probably
_cant_ do because it's noinline_for_stack.

> >
> > This one is mimicking the `CONFIG_BLOCK` one (`case 'g'` a bit above)
> > -- but we can change it, of course.
>
> That should be changed as well :)

Isn't the point to minimize code that's unused for certain configurations?

-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers



[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux