On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 11:05 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What happened to my suggestion from last time of encoding symbols < 128 > as 0-127 and symbols larger than that as (data[0] - 128) * 256 + > data[1]) ? Nothing, sorry, we focused on other parts (e.g. the allocation panics) during this iteration. I can take a look for v2. Cheers, Miguel
