On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:14:36AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 10:07:29AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:02:29AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:46:18AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:18:11AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your series! > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 7:34 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > > > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Almost every architecture has copied the "install.sh" script that > > > > > > originally came with i386, and modified it in very tiny ways. This > > > > > > patch series unifies all of these scripts into one single script to > > > > > > allow people to understand how to correctly install a kernel, and fixes > > > > > > up some issues regarding trying to install a kernel to a path with > > > > > > spaces in it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Note that not all architectures actually seem to have any type of way to > > > > > > install a kernel, they must rely on external scripts or tools which > > > > > > feels odd as everything should be included here in the main repository. > > > > > > I'll work on trying to figure out the missing architecture issues > > > > > > afterward. > > > > > > > > > > I'll bite ;-) > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone actually use these scripts (outside of x86)? > > > > > > Yes, every time I build a kernel. My kernel build system involves > > > typing "kbuild <flags> <dirname> <machines...>" and the kernel gets > > > built in ../build/<dirname>. When the build completes, it gets > > > installed into ~/systems/<dirname>, tar'd up, and copied to the > > > destination machines, unpacked, installed as appropriate, and > > > the machine rebooted if requested. > > > > > > The installation step is done via the ~/bin/installkernel script. > > > > So you don't use install.sh at all except to invoke your local script. > > It depends where the kernel is being built; it has been used in the > past (one will notice that the arm32 version is not a direct copy of > the x86 version, and never was - it was modified from day 1.) It's > placement and naming of the files in /boot is still used today, which > is slightly different from the x86 version. The placement depends on the caller to the script, so that's not an issue here. The name for the output does differ from x86, but the "common" script handles all of that (or it should, if not I messed up.) Attached below is the common scripts/install.sh that this patch series produces at the end of it, if you want to check to see if I missed anything for your arch. thanks, greg k-h
Attachment:
install.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
