On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 09:04:42AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:14 AM Nathan Chancellor > <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Patch 1 adds ld.lld support to Kconfig so that we can avoid certain > > ld.bfd checks. > > > > Is it possible to introduce and add LD_IS_BFD Kconfig for ld.bfd in this series? > Most people agreed on this name AFAICS. > What do people think? > > - Sedat - What is the use case for LD_IS_BFD right now? I am not sure I see a reason to add a CONFIG value that won't see any immediate use. Cheers, Nathan
