On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 15:18 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 2:21 PM Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 13:56 -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > > I think we should take a specific version stand as the > > > "minimum" version. Being able to build x86 defconfig is a good minimum > > > IMO. > > > > Agree. > > > > It's odd to say that clang 4 is fine for arm when it's > > not fine for x86. It's also reasonable to expect arm > > users to upgrade their compiler to a more recent version > > when the only cost is a very small bit of time. > > That's a very x86 centric point of view. Really? How many code generation improvements and possible defects have been corrected between clang 4 and clang 10 for arm? I presume more than a few.
