Re: [PATCH] scripts: prune-kernel:remove old kernels and modules dir from system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08:06 Thu 31 Oct 2019, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 10/31/19 12:18 AM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
On 22:27 Wed 30 Oct 2019, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 10/30/19 9:52 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
That 'rm' doesn't remove any files.  Compare what remove_old_kernel() does.
No,it is not using that function rather take the parameter from the
commandline and get into boot dir match with it and remove it.

But it doesn't do that.  I tested it.  It should be more like what
rmeove_old_kernel() does:

        rm -If vmlinuz-$kernel_ver System.map-$kernel_ver config-$kernel_ver

and if not, please explain why not.
Okay, again some uniformity missing in the code, I would like to your
suggested method,i.e call remove_old_kernel to do the job instead of depending on individual kernel.

The simplest thing to do is set kernel_version=$kernel_ver
and then call remove_old_kernel().
And set modules_version=$modules_dir_name and call remove_old_modules_dir().

But it would be cleaner to pass a parameter (kernel_version) to the
remove_old_kernel() function and to pass a parameter (modules_dir) to the
remove_old_modules_dir() function.



Thank you...I have just modified the code and call both the function
under remove option. BTW I didn't set the extra variable $kernel_ver name it $kernel_version and instead of $modules_dir_name name it $mo
dules_version.

Capturing command line parameter in $kernel_version and $modules_version

Is that fine? Here is a code snippet:

Yes, that should be OK.

-r | --remove)
  if [[ $# -ne 3 ]]; then
   printf "You need to provide kernel version and modules directory
   name \n"
   exit 1
   else
   remove_old_kernel
   remove_old_modules_dir
   fi


I have just test it and it works.


And about solitary r option without hypen is ignoring and doing nothing.

Means, if I pass ./scripts/prune-kernel r 5.3.3
it simply ignore and does nothing.Only with the hypen it can work.

Is that how it should be?
or what would you expect that to do?
Yes it should be. Any malformed parameter should be discarded,except
what explicitly given in code form,as help reminder.
OR
Do you want me to reminds user that they are missing thing to operate
correctly??

--
~Randy
Bhaskar

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux