On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 13:38:04 +0900 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2018-02-10 23:25 GMT+09:00 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>: > > Incremental linking is gone, so rename built-in.o to built-in.a, which > > is the usual extension for archive files. > > > > This patch does two things, first is a simple search/replace: > > > > git grep -l 'built-in\.o' | xargs sed -i 's/built-in\.o/built-in\.a/g' > > > > The second is to invert nesting of nested text manipulations to avoid > > filtering built-in.a out from libs-y2: > > > > -libs-y2 := $(filter-out %.a, $(patsubst %/, %/built-in.a, $(libs-y))) > > +libs-y2 := $(patsubst %/, %/built-in.a, $(filter-out %.a, $(libs-y))) > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx> > > > I think this is the right thing to do, but I have no idea > why 'less kernel/built-in.a' shows strange output. > Do you have a clue? > > > Without this patch, > 'emacs kernel/built-in.o' > 'cat kernel/built-in.o' > 'less kernel/built-in.o' > > showed me the same content. > > $ less kernel/built-in.o | head -n 10 > !<thin> > // 2964 ` > fork.o/ > exec_domain.o/ > panic.o/ > cpu.o/ > exit.o/ > softirq.o/ > resource.o/ > sysctl.o/ > > > > > After applying this patch, > 'less kernel/built-in.a' is strange. > > > $ less kernel/built-in.a | head -n 10 > rw-r--r-- 0/0 60216 Jan 1 09:00 1970 kernel/fork.o > rw-r--r-- 0/0 3648 Jan 1 09:00 1970 kernel/exec_domain.o > rw-r--r-- 0/0 20552 Jan 1 09:00 1970 kernel/panic.o > rw-r--r-- 0/0 87752 Jan 1 09:00 1970 kernel/cpu.o > rw-r--r-- 0/0 34136 Jan 1 09:00 1970 kernel/exit.o > rw-r--r-- 0/0 41448 Jan 1 09:00 1970 kernel/softirq.o > rw-r--r-- 0/0 40904 Jan 1 09:00 1970 kernel/resource.o > rw-r--r-- 0/0 60968 Jan 1 09:00 1970 kernel/sysctl.o > rw-r--r-- 0/0 4472 Jan 1 09:00 1970 kernel/sysctl_binary.o > rw-r--r-- 0/0 12472 Jan 1 09:00 1970 kernel/capability.o > > > However, 'cat kernel/built-in.a' works as I expect. > > $ cat kernel/built-in.a | head -n 10 > !<thin> > // 2964 ` > fork.o/ > exec_domain.o/ > panic.o/ > cpu.o/ > exit.o/ > softirq.o/ > resource.o/ > sysctl.o/ > > > > Is my 'less' insane? > Or, is this intentional behavior of 'less'? Interesting, my less does not do that. Instead of the raw contents of the file, yours is providing output of `ar tv`, which is reconstructing more of the archive metadata. I guess it is keyed on the filename extension. Do you have an alias for it, or maybe the distro patches the tool? It seems a bit rude for your less tool to reformat data for you. Thanks, Nick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html