Re: [PATCH 2/2] kbuild: rename built-in.o to built-in.a

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2018-02-10 23:25 GMT+09:00 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Incremental linking is gone, so rename built-in.o to built-in.a, which
> is the usual extension for archive files.
>
> This patch does two things, first is a simple search/replace:
>
> git grep -l 'built-in\.o' | xargs sed -i 's/built-in\.o/built-in\.a/g'
>
> The second is to invert nesting of nested text manipulations to avoid
> filtering built-in.a out from libs-y2:
>
> -libs-y2 := $(filter-out %.a, $(patsubst %/, %/built-in.a, $(libs-y)))
> +libs-y2 := $(patsubst %/, %/built-in.a, $(filter-out %.a, $(libs-y)))
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>


I think this is the right thing to do, but I have no idea
why 'less kernel/built-in.a' shows strange output.
Do you have a clue?


Without this patch,
'emacs kernel/built-in.o'
'cat kernel/built-in.o'
'less kernel/built-in.o'

showed me the same content.

$ less kernel/built-in.o | head -n 10
!<thin>
//                                              2964      `
fork.o/
exec_domain.o/
panic.o/
cpu.o/
exit.o/
softirq.o/
resource.o/
sysctl.o/




After applying this patch,
'less kernel/built-in.a' is strange.


$ less kernel/built-in.a | head -n 10
rw-r--r-- 0/0  60216 Jan  1 09:00 1970 kernel/fork.o
rw-r--r-- 0/0   3648 Jan  1 09:00 1970 kernel/exec_domain.o
rw-r--r-- 0/0  20552 Jan  1 09:00 1970 kernel/panic.o
rw-r--r-- 0/0  87752 Jan  1 09:00 1970 kernel/cpu.o
rw-r--r-- 0/0  34136 Jan  1 09:00 1970 kernel/exit.o
rw-r--r-- 0/0  41448 Jan  1 09:00 1970 kernel/softirq.o
rw-r--r-- 0/0  40904 Jan  1 09:00 1970 kernel/resource.o
rw-r--r-- 0/0  60968 Jan  1 09:00 1970 kernel/sysctl.o
rw-r--r-- 0/0   4472 Jan  1 09:00 1970 kernel/sysctl_binary.o
rw-r--r-- 0/0  12472 Jan  1 09:00 1970 kernel/capability.o


However, 'cat kernel/built-in.a' works as I expect.

$ cat  kernel/built-in.a | head -n 10
!<thin>
//                                              2964      `
fork.o/
exec_domain.o/
panic.o/
cpu.o/
exit.o/
softirq.o/
resource.o/
sysctl.o/



Is my 'less' insane?
Or, is this intentional behavior of 'less'?




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux