On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 16:32 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 16.01.15 at 17:25, <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 15:44 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> scripts/kconfig/zconf.l | 7 + > >> scripts/kconfig/zconf.lex.c_shipped | 195 +++++++++++++++++++----------------- > >> sound/soc/intel/Kconfig | 4 > > > > I guess Michal would like to split the c_shipped changes in this patch > > too. (I personally don't care.) And I think the sound/soc/intel/Kconfig > > should be a separate patch. > > I simply didn't want the patch to create fallout (even if it's just > warnings). If doing this here is deemed inappropriate, I'd likely > drop the adjustment altogether and just mention the effect the > patch has. Following up with the various subsystem maintainers > until they pick up patches is, hmm, difficult. Certainly. Just a few days ago I sent out a reminder to some maintainers that, at best, borders on counterproductive. In this case Jiri might be the quickest road to trivial success. Jiri responds in a reasonable time, hardly ever misses patches, and doesn't bark if you dare send a reminder. Anyhow, I wish I had sent out the trivial patch to fix that Kconfig last year. Then we wouldn't have had this conversation. Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
