Re: [PATCH 1/6] selftests: Introduce minimal shared logic for running tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/09/2015 02:06 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> This adds a Make include file which most selftests can then include to
> get the run_tests logic.
> 
> On its own this has the advantage of some reduction in repetition, and
> also means the pass/fail message is defined in fewer places.
> 
> However the key advantage is it will allow us to implement install very
> simply in a subsequent patch.
> 
> The default implementation just executes each program in $(TEST_PROGS).
> 
> We use a variable to hold the default implementation of $(RUN_TESTS)
> because that gives us a clean way to override it if necessary, ie. using
> override. The mount, memory-hotplug and mqueue tests use that to provide
> a different implementation.
> 
> Tests are not run via /bin/bash, so if they are scripts they must be
> executable, we add u+x to several.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I like the shared logic approach in general provided it leaves the
flexibility to not use the shared logic if a test have the need to
do so. This series requires some patch planning. shared logic patch
followed by individual test patches as opposed a single patch.

I would like to see the shared logic work done on top of my patch v4
series.

thanks,
-- Shuah


-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux