Re: Do I have to rename file when a module changes dependency from 1 file to 2 file?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 22:40 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 05:19:57PM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> > Currently I have a module foo that has only 1 file foo.c.  However, I
> > need to add another assembly file (bar.S) to the module and wonder what
> > is the best way to modify the Makefile without having to rename foo.c.
> > 
> > My original Makefile looks like:
> > 
> > obj-$(CONFIG_FOO) += foo.o
> > 
> > I have to rename foo.c to baz.c, then update the Makefile as below to
> > get things to work.
> > 
> > obj-$(CONFIG_FOO) += foo.o
> > foo-y := baz.o bar.S
> > 
> > However, is there a way to change the Makefile so I don't have to
> > rename foo.c?  That will reduce the size of the patch I have to
> > generate.  Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
> 
> You need to rename the file - there are no other options.
> 
> With respect to patch size.
> Patch 1/2 is the renaming + Makefile. If you use git use "-D -M" options IIRC.

Thanks.  The "-M" option works pretty well for my purpose.


Tim


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux