Hi all, I have noticed that we use the following paradigm quite a bit theses days: config <something select HAVE_<config1> config <config1> depends on HAVE_<config1> or similar I was wondering if it would make sense to replace this with: config <something enable <config1> config <config1> depends on enabled The advantage of this is that we would not have all the HAVE_ config names in our .config files and the generated include files. Of course, if config1 does not depend on "enabled", then the "enable <config1>" would have no effect (we may want to warn about this). Comments? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgplg8HgXHafX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
