Am 26.02.12 22:05, schrieb Sam Ravnborg: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 06:51:34PM +0100, Bernhard Walle wrote: >> Am 26.02.12 18:48, schrieb Sam Ravnborg: >>>>> --- a/scripts/Kbuild.include >>>>> +++ b/scripts/Kbuild.include >>>>> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ as-option = $(call try-run,\ >>>>> # Usage: cflags-y += $(call as-instr,instr,option1,option2) >>>>> >>>>> as-instr = $(call try-run,\ >>>>> - /bin/echo -e "$(1)" | $(CC) $(KBUILD_AFLAGS) -c -xassembler -o "$$TMP" -,$(2),$(3)) >>>>> + printf "%b\n" "$(1)" | $(CC) $(KBUILD_AFLAGS) -c -xassembler -o "$$TMP" -,$(2),$(3)) >>>>> >>>>> # cc-option >>>>> # Usage: cflags-y += $(call cc-option,-march=winchip-c6,-march=i586) >>> Roman Zippel removed use of printf in this patch: beda9f3a13bbb22cde92a45f230a02ef2afef6a9 >>> >>> I cannot remember why - but it would be good if you could dig up >>> why - just so we do not hit an old issue again. >> >> Well, he used printf "$(1)", that's different from printf "%b\n" "$(1)" >> since format strings inside $(1) would be interpreted. > Makes good sense. Can we merge that for 3.4? Who is responsible, i.e. whose tree? Regards, Bernhard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
