On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 06:44:32PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > >> Fixed and pushed (um-header.git #master); however, looking around that area >> shows more races ;-/ > > Such as, for example, seriously broken handling of free_winch(): delaying > free_irq() until after return from IRQ handler is nice, but not enough - > freeing struct winch itself (or winch->stack, for that matter) is also best > left until after free_irq(). Normal way to do that is schedule_work()... > Fixed and pushed... > > Folks, I don't know what to do with all that stuff; as far as I'm concerned > the ideal variant would be to have functioning git tree maintained by Richard. > Is that possible? I can ask to start pulling um-header.git into linux-next, > but I would very much prefer to avoid that, TYVM... If nothing else, ACK/NAK > on the stuff in there should be done by architecture maintainer(s). > Sorry for the delay. Writing my theses consumes a lot of my time... I've already started reviewing and testing your changes. Currently they life in my local git repo. But a git.kernel.org repo is on the way! Later I'll submit all changes to akpm. -- Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
