Re: [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 06:44:32PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:

> Fixed and pushed (um-header.git #master); however, looking around that area
> shows more races ;-/

Such as, for example, seriously broken handling of free_winch(): delaying
free_irq() until after return from IRQ handler is nice, but not enough -
freeing struct winch itself (or winch->stack, for that matter) is also best
left until after free_irq().  Normal way to do that is schedule_work()...
Fixed and pushed...

Folks, I don't know what to do with all that stuff; as far as I'm concerned
the ideal variant would be to have functioning git tree maintained by Richard.
Is that possible?  I can ask to start pulling um-header.git into linux-next,
but I would very much prefer to avoid that, TYVM...  If nothing else, ACK/NAK
on the stuff in there should be done by architecture maintainer(s).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux