On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 16:07 +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > On 18.7.2011 21:05, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Arnaud Lacombe<lacombar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Cc: Steven Rostedt<srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> Makefile | 3 +++ > >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > >> index afb8e0d..ea517fd 100644 > >> --- a/Makefile > >> +++ b/Makefile > >> @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ LC_COLLATE=C > >> LC_NUMERIC=C > >> export LC_COLLATE LC_NUMERIC > >> > >> +# Export make goals > >> +export MAKECMDGOALS > >> + > >> # We are using a recursive build, so we need to do a little thinking > >> # to get the ordering right. > >> # > > Michal, before I send a new version of this serie, can you tell me > > your point of view on the export of MAKECMDGOALS (or > > KBUILD_MAKECMDGOALS) and Kconfig to the environment ? > > A cleaner interface would IMO be to check the target in the makefile and > pass a commandline option to streamline_config.pl, so that it's easier > to run it manually. I agree with this. As I've been told by many people that they prefer to run streamline_config.pl directly. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
