Hi, On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 18.7.2011 21:05, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Arnaud Lacombe<lacombar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Cc: Steven Rostedt<srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Makefile | 3 +++ >>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile >>> index afb8e0d..ea517fd 100644 >>> --- a/Makefile >>> +++ b/Makefile >>> @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ LC_COLLATE=C >>> LC_NUMERIC=C >>> export LC_COLLATE LC_NUMERIC >>> >>> +# Export make goals >>> +export MAKECMDGOALS >>> + >>> # We are using a recursive build, so we need to do a little thinking >>> # to get the ordering right. >>> # >> >> Michal, before I send a new version of this serie, can you tell me >> your point of view on the export of MAKECMDGOALS (or >> KBUILD_MAKECMDGOALS) and Kconfig to the environment ? > > A cleaner interface would IMO be to check the target in the makefile and > pass a commandline option to streamline_config.pl, so that it's easier to > run it manually. > thanks, I'll do the same for $(Kconfig), ie. pass it on the command line. - Arnaud -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
