On 12.5.2011 23:38, matt mooney wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Michal Marek<mmarek@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12.5.2011 23:07, matt mooney wrote:
2011/5/12 Michal Marek<mmarek@xxxxxxx>:
Neither git archive not git rev-parse need the work tree, --git-dir=..
is sufficient.
Are you sure?
Yes.
$ cd /tmp
$ git --git-dir=$HOME/linux-2.6/.git rev-parse HEAD
e0a04b11e4059cab033469617c2a3ce2d8cab416
You are right about that command, but it doesn't use the source tree.
Yes, neither git rev-parse nor git archive use the work tree. That's
what I tried to explain to you in my first mail.
Do a git --git-dir=$HOME/linux-2.6/.git status from /tmp and see what
happens.
That's irrelevant, I only talked about archive and rev-parse.
So do you want me to send a new patch without --work-tree= in git rev-parse?
And in git archive.
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
