On 8.10.2010 17:12, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:54:38PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: >> Oh, sorry, I didn't realize that this is a regression from 2.6.35 and >> applied it to the kconfig branch, which is part of for-next. I'll try to >> send a pull request with this patch and two other later today, but I >> don't know if Linus is going to accept it. >> > > It's not a regression from .35, just trying to avoid unexpected changes Yeah, I meant "bug introduced in 2.6.36-rc1". > to how parts of the build system work after release (which means it > could be perceived as a regression from .36 to .37) > > IE: Someone begins to expect this behaviour in 2.6.36, and then > the patch goes into 2.6.37-rc1, so 2.6.37 behaves differently. I see. Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html