> > Is there any reason not to apply the patch below, to allow more awk > > implementations to be used? After all, it's not like we're going to put > > non-ASCII characters into the map file... > I guess the question is if it will break under any other circumstances, > but I guess we can find those when we get to them. I should have mentioned it, but with the current Debian testing version (mawk 1.3.3-15) and my patch, I get a byte-for-byte identical inat-tables.c to what I get with the unpatched kernel and gawk 1:3.1.6.dfsg-4. I'm not sure how likely all this is to change in the future, but it's hard for me to see a sane reason why eg [:lower:] and a-z would be different for this use. - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
