Is there any reason not to apply the patch below, to allow more awk
implementations to be used? After all, it's not like we're going to put
non-ASCII characters into the map file...
===
x86: Don't use POSIX character classes in gen-insn-attr-x86.awk
Not all awk implementations (including the default awk in Ubuntu 9.10)
support POSIX character classes. Since x86-opcode-map.txt is plain
ASCII, we can just use explicit ranges for lower case, alphabetic, and
alphanumeric characters instead.
Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <rolandd@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/tools/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk | 10 ++++------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/tools/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk b/arch/x86/tools/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk
index 7a68506..eaf11f5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/tools/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk
+++ b/arch/x86/tools/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk
@@ -6,8 +6,6 @@
# Awk implementation sanity check
function check_awk_implement() {
- if (!match("abc", "[[:lower:]]+"))
- return "Your awk doesn't support charactor-class."
if (sprintf("%x", 0) != "0")
return "Your awk has a printf-format problem."
return ""
@@ -44,12 +42,12 @@ BEGIN {
delete gtable
delete atable
- opnd_expr = "^[[:alpha:]/]"
+ opnd_expr = "^[A-Za-z/]"
ext_expr = "^\\("
sep_expr = "^\\|$"
- group_expr = "^Grp[[:alnum:]]+"
+ group_expr = "^Grp[0-9A-Za-z]+"
- imm_expr = "^[IJAO][[:lower:]]"
+ imm_expr = "^[IJAO][a-z]"
imm_flag["Ib"] = "INAT_MAKE_IMM(INAT_IMM_BYTE)"
imm_flag["Jb"] = "INAT_MAKE_IMM(INAT_IMM_BYTE)"
imm_flag["Iw"] = "INAT_MAKE_IMM(INAT_IMM_WORD)"
@@ -62,7 +60,7 @@ BEGIN {
imm_flag["Ob"] = "INAT_MOFFSET"
imm_flag["Ov"] = "INAT_MOFFSET"
- modrm_expr = "^([CDEGMNPQRSUVW/][[:lower:]]+|NTA|T[012])"
+ modrm_expr = "^([CDEGMNPQRSUVW/][a-z]+|NTA|T[012])"
force64_expr = "\\([df]64\\)"
rex_expr = "^REX(\\.[XRWB]+)*"
fpu_expr = "^ESC" # TODO
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
